Saturday, November 18, 2006

Fun with a flashgun- Nikon SB-26



Squares

Click here for large size image



I borrowed a flashgun from Lee CF today. It is a wicked Nikon SB-26, with a hot shoe connection, PC-synch terminals (male and female), swivelling and tilting zoom head (20-85mm) and a guide number of 35 m.

Shooting modes include automatic, manual, TTL and strobe. Automatic mode uses an on-board sensor to detect the flash strength required for proper exposure (after feeding in the correct camera parameters into the flash unit). Manual is precisely that, manual. The only variable is the power output, which can be reduced as powers of 2. Full power, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 and 1/64. TTL mode is only available to Nikon cameras that can communicate with the flash unit via additional contacts.




Not an Advertisement

Click here for large size image



Strobe mode makes the unit behave like a stroboscope. The parameters that can be adjusted in this mode are: flash intensity, number of flashes, and flash frequency. The frequency can be adjusted from 1 to 50 Hz. Of course, the number of flashes depends on the frequency and intensity of each flash.

I did some flash tests. A powerful and directional flash head does wonders to the lighting. Directing the light at the ceiling results in very even lighting that does not make the pimples shine nor does it cast sharp shadows.




Click here for large size image




Click here for large size image

Ok, I look freaky here. I was staring at the countdown light on the camera, hence the evil eye.
Please stop judging my eye. It is a good eye. Wankers.



The preceding shots were done using two cameras. The digital camera was used to capture the scene while the film SLR was used to trigger the flash. The flash was pointed forward and upwards to light the wall and ceiling. The digital camera was pre-focused, exposure set to 2s, and the self timer set to 10s. Windows blinds were drawn and the lights were extinguished. The timer was tripped and the subject positioned in place. When the shutter opened, the subject triggered his camera to produce the illumination. The SLR camera’s shutter was then recocked without advancing the film as to avoid (further) wasting film.

I suddenly have this want for a large flashgun. Something powerful with variable power output and a directional head.

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 02, 2006

The Devil Wears Prada - a review

Jolene mentioned it was good, so I did not object when the said film was suggested. This is called ‘faith’.

My review will consist of two parts: one without spoilers, another with.


Watchable. The big screen doesn’t do much difference to the viewing experience. Do not think too much while watching it; this is not a joint lecture by Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking – it’s a Hollywood production.


Ethics demand that I warn the reader that the following text contains spoilers. Stop reading if you do not want to know the plot.


The essence of this plot is an unremarkable country girl in a big city kind of story. Not surprisingly for this kind of a plot, the protagonist is thrown into an environment where she does not fit, but manages to survive and then outrun the competition. In the process, her new lifestyle draws her further and further away from her friends and her love life also starts to fray. Of course, everything ends well with close-ups of the key cast smiling at their memories, and everyone being happy. A typically fuzzy, "awww"-inducing ending.

One important issue that appears to crop up is the transient nature of happiness when living the high-life. Of course, one cannot be sure if that is just an artefact of the plot or an intentional highlight by the director.

In this film, conformity is a presented as a good thing. In particular, satisfying the boss’s and colleague’s demands and fashion sense are of grave importance. The portrayal is such that the boss’s perception of the protagonist becomes a looming substitute for happiness. One scene which highlights this is where the boss wants something impossible done, and when it was not done, the demanding boss expresses her disappointment at the protagonist. The protagonist turns teary eyed and weepy even though it is no fault of hers.

Note of warning: don’t even ask where the protagonist got her clothes from. That question is beyond the scope of the film and this film review.

Memorable scene: the entire office panicking to tidy up when they learn that the boss will be arriving several hours early.

Predictable scene: the protagonist’s phone rings; she looks at it, ponders a moment and tosses it into a nearby body of water. And walks away with a spring in her step.



Labels:

Monday, September 18, 2006

"Good Writing Guide" by HarperCollins

In general, I am quite meticulous with my (English) grammar and sentence structures. In the near future, expect an upgrade from meticulous to anal.

My father’s friend recently flew into Melbourne, and offered to ferry some goods to me. Together with a box of mooncakes, my parents also gave me a book entitled “Good Writing Guide” by HarperCollins.

It is a very beautiful book, but unfortunately, a rough transit had fucked it up a bit. Sigh.

The cover is metallic lavender in colour with a matt surface finish, and the title is printed in large narrow font, coloured in extremely bright pink gloss ink. It sounds horrible, but when was the last time you saw a lavender coloured book?



I snipped some lavender blooms from a neighbour's flower pots to illustrate the colour of this book


So far, this book appears to be a very well written book; not many can write about grammar in an engaging manner. Observe:
I saw you in my underwear!

Could mean either I saw you when I was wearing only my underwear, or, more ominously, I saw you, wearing my underwear!

Good Writing Guide is published in the United Kingdom, which means it is not teaching American English. I’m biased against American English.


***


In other language related issues, I recently discovered/ was shown a few interesting things that I probably should have known earlier.

For example,


zhá – deep-fry
zhà – explode

I never knew zhá existed- I always said zhà regardless of referring to car bombs or potato chips.


石头
shí tou (sounds like tòu), not shí tóu



Labels:

Monday, August 07, 2006

Warning: very long, multi-section entry

Table of contents:

An eye-opener of a lunch
不礼貌之客 (no English translation)
Ss. Peter and Paul Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral (photographs)
Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson


An eye-opener of a lunch

Lunch today was actually preset to Tai Ping Yang (太平洋) in Richmond. It is a popular Chinese restaurant, and apparently it is good. Upon arriving at the venue, its popularity was confirmed- there was a queue at the counter, and the floor was packed. It looked like a scene straight out of Hong Kong, complete with strips of juicy char siew (叉烧), hunks of crispy siew yuk (烧肉) and roasted birds hanging at the front window, and strangers sharing tables in a crowded eatery.

Precisely because the restaurant’s popularity was confirmed in such a resounding manner, I could not investigate claims that the food is good.

There was another interesting restaurant in the vicinity, with an extremely attractive name too: Chilli Paradise (辣翻天). The most interesting (read: shocking) dish we ordered was the 水煮鱼 (literally, fish cooked in water).

It came served inelegantly in a huge, thin-walled stainless-steel bowl basin. But that’s not the point, it’s the edible bits that is the point.



Click here for large size image


Slices of fish and bean sprouts come immersed in the basin-full of liquid. A large quantity of little red dried chillies float on the surface of the fluid. The fluid itself is not soup but…

*drum roll*

chilli oil.

The chilli is remarkable. Unlike the chillies we are accustomed to, this is a completely different animal plant. It is numbing- bite into a seed or whatever chilli fragment and the tongue takes on a tingling, numbed sensation. For a first timer, it feels extremely weird. However, it is not hot in the usual sense. There is no perspiration nor runny nose, avoiding the unpleasant scene of a wet scalp and dripping nasal fluids.

But that numbing spiciness is a real eye opener. It will rearrange your perception of the universe, assuming the sight of that pot of chillies hasn’t already done so.



Click here for large size image




The dish itself was wonderful. The fish was liberally rubbed with pepper before being immersed in the chilli oil. The bean sprouts gave a nice crunchy contrast to the smooth fish slices. The chilli oil had sesame oil and what feels like some (spring) onions. And it is not as frightening as it looks, so stop whining.

There was quite a lot of fish and bean sprouts hidden between all that chilli and oil, and at $12, it is worth every cent.

Very, very highly recommended, but only if you dig chillies. Otherwise, stay away.






不礼貌之客

今晚,有四个客人到餐馆用餐。

同事Gregory给他们点了菜、送了饮品后,跟我说他们很不礼貌。当时,我还没跟他们接触,就把Gregory的埋怨当为耳边风。

他们差不多吃完了,我去把他们的水杯装满。正倒着时,他们四人一点反应都没有。到完后,没有一个抬起头来,没有一声谢谢,没有一个人把手招一招。果然不礼貌。

我把空水瓶拿回bar去,见老板和Gregory在讨论着这四个客人。老板横着看了他们一眼,问起:“不知他们是什么地方来的?”

Gregory说:“应该是马来西亚吧。”
老板问道:“你又懂?”
“他们讲广东话的。”
“可能是香港嘞?”
我答:“一定不是,香港人的口音不是这样的。”
“新加坡呢?”

这继续了好几分钟,老板似乎希望着这几个人不是来自自己的母国。论了一会,发现他们都很像马来西亚人。这时,老板就开始才他们来自哪个州。

老板笑着说:“一定是马六甲啦!”他指着Gregory,仿佛他罚了严重的罪。
来自马六甲的Gregory反驳:“喂,又关我什么事?”


另一桌吃完了,我把他们的碗碟收回到厨房。手里拿着许许多多的盘,走过这四个客人。只听一声“卖单”,没有招手,没有抬头,没有“excuse me”。我转了身,向他们点头表示明白,便走向厨房去。走过bar时,我跟他们说声“3号要bill。”

搞好了那座得空碗碟后,我说:“真的过分。走过他们就‘卖单’的一声叫单。”
Gregory答:“我们知道。你走了进去他们还喊着卖单卖单。”
我的双眼自动得睁开了一些,半信半疑地“哈。。。?”了一声。

他们终于付了钱(没有小费)而离开(老板向他们说谢谢,他们没反应)。

老板:这些人,真的事。。。
一维:是啦。你刚才跟他们将在煎他们都不回答。
老板:最好是出去跌进水沟里。

老板:都是不要那么衰。踏倒狗粪就好了。大块的狗粪。
一维:又软又臭的。
老板:然后没有发现到,进了车弄得整车都是狗粪。
一维:不然回到家里,印到地毯上。
老板:而且是白色的地毯!



Ss. Peter and Paul Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral (photographs)

From a particular entrance to my block of flats I get a clear view of the white dome of the Ss. Peter and Paul Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral, a Ukrainian Catholic cathedral in North Melbourne. When the sun is just behind the dome, it shines through it’s stained glass, and becomes a dramatic beacon.

Yesterday, I took a walk to the cathedral to have a closer look. It’s quite a magnificent structure.




Click here for large size image





Click here for large size image





Click here for large size image





It even has a lightning rod!




Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson

Some time ago, Michelle Chong recommended Cryptonomicon. It is a brilliant book. Below is a 2-page excerpt:



“Let me just demonstrate,” Waterhouse blurts, and strides out of the room and doesn’t bother looking back. Back in the church, he goes to the console, blows the dandruff off the keys, hits the main power switch. The electric motors come on, somewhere back behind the screen, and the instrument begins to complain and whine. No matter – it can all be drowned out. He scans the rows of stops – he already knows what this organ’s got, because he’s listened and deconstructed. He starts yanking out knobs.

Now Waterhouse is going to demonstrate that Bach can sound good even played on Mr Drkh’s organ, if you choose the right key. Just as Father John and Mr. Drkh are about halfway up the aisle, Waterhouse slams into that old chestnut, Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, except that he’s transposing it into C-sharp minor as he goes along, because (according to a very elegant calculation that just came into his head as he was running up the aisle of the church) it ought to sound good that way when played in Mr Drkh’s mangled tuning system.

The transposition is an awkward business at first and he hits a few wrong notes, but then it comes naturally and he transitions from the toccata into the fugue with tremendous verve and confidence. Gouts of dust and salvos of mouse droppings explode from the pipes as Waterhouse invokes whole ranks that have not been used in decades. Many of these involve big bad loud reed stops that are difficult to tune. Waterhouse senses the pumping machinery straining to keep up with this unprecedented demand for power. The choir loft is suffused with a brilliant glow as the dust flung out of the choked pipes fills the air and catches the light coming through the rose window. Waterhouse muffs a pedal line, spitefully kicks off his terrible shoes and begins to tread the pedals the way he used to in Virginia, with his bare feet, the trajectory of the bass line traced out across the wooden pedals in lines of blood from his exploded blisters. This baby has some nasty thirty-two-foot reed stops in the pedals, real earthshakers, probably put there specifically to irritate the Outer Qwghlmians across the street. None of the people who go to this church have ever heard these stops called into action, but Waterhouse puts them to good use now, firing off power chords like salvos from the mighty guns from the battleship Iowa.

All during the service, during the sermon and the scripture readings and the prayers, when he wasn’t thinking of fucking Mary, he was thinking of how he was going to fix the organ. He was thinking back to the organ he worked on in Virginia, how the stops enabled the flow of air to the different ranks of pipes and how the keys on the keyboard activated all the pipes that were enabled. He has this whole organ visualised in his head now, while he is pounding through to the end of the figure, the top of his skull comes off, the filtered red light pours in, he sees the entire machine in his mind, as if in an exploded draftman’s view. Then it transforms itself into a slightly different machine- an organ that runs on electricity, with ranks of vacuum tubes here, and a grid of relays there. He has the answer, now, to Turning’s question, the question of how to make a pattern of binary data and bury it into the circuitry of a thinking machine so that it can be later disterred.

Waterhouse knows how to make electric memory. He must go write a letter to Alan immediately!

“Excuse me,” he says, and runs from the church. On his way out, he brushes past a small woman who had been standing there gaping at his performance. When he is several blocks away, he realises two things: that he is walking down the street barefoot, and that the young woman was Mary cCmndhd. He will have to circle back later and get his shoes and maybe fuck her. But first things first!








Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 23, 2006

"Climb Dance" and "Rendezvous" - two very good alternatives to "Fast & Furious: Tokyo Drift" trailers

I read reports that the film Fast & Furious: Tokyo Drift is a somewhat plotless, action packed flick. If the drift action is good, I would not mind forking out a bit of money to watch it on the big screen.

A look at the trailers available convinced me otherwise. I’ll openly admit it, I’m extremely critical when it comes to movies, which is why I rarely ever watch anything.

Anyway, here are two much more satisfying ways to spend a few minutes than watching crappy trailers.


***


"Climb Dance" is a multiple award winning short film by starring Finnish rally driver Ari Vatanen. This is re
al footage of the Pikes Peak Hill Climb, a time trail competition event held in Colorado, USA. Watch out for the hairpin turn where the car’s rear overhang literally overhangs the cliff edge (3.51). Ari’s control of the wheel is particularly impressive between the times 3.35 and 3.48. If only they had thought to include a pedal cam...



If you cannot load this video click on this link to go to YouTube’s page.



Another magnificent short film is "C'était un rendez-vous" (English title "Rendezvous"), an 8-minute blitz through Paris in a Ferrari 275 GTB at dawn. In this film, you can feel your pulse quicken as the driver snakes through traffic, dark and narrow alleys and makes abrupt turns.

It is said that at one particularly risky intersection, an arrangement was set up using walkie-talkies such that if there was traffic, a sentry will inform the driver to abort. Everything went smoothly to the end, where they discovered that the walkie-talkies were in fact not working.



If you cannot load this video click on this link to go to YouTube’s page.



And finally, here is something completely daft: the Dead or Alive Xtreme 2 (by the way, it’s an Xbox game) trailer that was released in the E3. Seriously pointless eye candy for heterosexual boys and homosexual girls, this video appears to be a technological showcase of Microsoft’s might.

Observe the amount of detail gone into solving the differential equations of motion (of breasts) and the video rendering quality. Beyond that, there is probably not much of significance. But the differential equations of motion...

Credit goes to Jun Ian for highlighting the existence of this video.



If you cannot load this video click on this link to go to YouTube’s page.


Labels:

Monday, May 29, 2006

3-in-1 film review: Autumn Sonata, Animal Farm, Bulletproof Monk, and suggestions on ways to find a good film.

Some films are better than others. Autumn Sonata, a 1978 Swedish film, is among the better ones.

I was surprised to see Lena Nyman’s name in the credits. Lena had starred in the fantastic 1960s series of two films, I am Curious (Yellow) & I am Curious (Blue). Surprise turned to disappointment when I realised she played the minor role of the mentally retarded woman with not much screen time. Vivid portrayal though.

Enough about Nyman in a Liv Ullman and Ulgrid Bergman film. Liv Ullman plays Eva, the daughter of Charlotte (acted by Ulgrid Bergman). Both women were excellent actresses, and their expressions conveyed plenty. This was helped by the camerawork, with an emphasis on the actresses’ faces when they speak emotionally strained.

But that is not surprising. What is remarkable are the portrait-like scenes of the mother while her daughter plays one of Chopin’s preludes, a very plain expression, but with alternating undertones of happiness, disappointment and pleasure. Or the scene where Eva reads the contents of a letter aloud to the camera, her eyes piercing the viewer.

It is important to watch this film with the original Swedish audio and read the subtitles, rather than settling for an English dub. After all, the actresses have all the correct intonations in the voice, which in this film, counts a lot more than mere meaning of the spoken words.

Watching Autumn Sonata was definitely 90 minutes well spent.


***


One of George Orwell’s famous novels is Animal Farm, a satirical novel on Soviet totalitarianism. The 1999 film interpretation of Animal Farm cannot be viewed with the same eye that read the novel; in fact, the film interpretation is a severely diluted version of the original.

The story is narrated by Jesse, a farm dog whose litter of puppies were taken away from her. It turns out they were being groomed to become the private military of Napoleon, who seized power with the help of this Guard. The dog that played Jesse, and voice actress Julia Ormond seemed to fit their roles very well.

Most of the film remains faithful to the book, but there were some inevitable truncations.

The most disturbing part though, was the ending. The timeline in this film continues further than that found in the book, although not much elaboration is given. But the happy ending is not at all impressive. It is a mere return to the status quo, albeit a better status quo than under the previous rulers.

By providing a happy, all-is-well kind of ending, the film seems to shut down any further thought in the viewer’s mind after watching the film. The book ended on a depressing note that was left hanging, a question burning in the reader’s mind. This, is nothing.

I didn’t mind the film, but I think a re-read of the original text would have much more thought provoking and enlightening.


***


And, now that we have discussed the better films, let’s talk about the horrible one.

Bulletproof Monk (2003) is stuffed full of unimaginative clichés- prophesies, unlimited power, clash of cultures, street-smart daughter of a convicted Russian gang leader who happens to know the differences between Shaolin and Tibetan monks. And of course, a Nazi villain.

The movie concludes on a happy note, with the villain perishing and all. But the way in which it was executed leaves a bad taste in the mouth. The fight scenes are insubstantial, making the victory seem inconsequential.

A good waste of an idle hour or two, if mindless entertainment is your pleasure. Beyond that, Bulletproof Monk is best left untouched.

ps.- To date, this film reaped US$37 million worldwide, in comparison to its production budget of US$52 million. That's how bad it is. [source]


***


The rate of production of movies worldwide far exceeds the ability of any normal person to watch them all. And to watch lots of bad films just to find the occasional brilliant film is preposterous.

However, there are some filtration methods one can employ to find these rare films. A good film will generally make it across language barriers, receive positive remarks, its popularity persist for years past its release, and transcend technological barriers as the years go by.

If you find a dubbed or subtitled foreign language film in a mainstream movie source, chances is that it was good enough to warrant the effort to introduce it to foreign markets. Similarly, when looking for good English films, it will make sense to search for films that have been released successfully in non-English markets.

Films that can boast being nominated or awarded film prizes must have been markedly different from the rest to deserve that. Still, it must be noted that not all prizes are equal- some prizes are more equal than others. Also, some people prefer the stuff of Cannes than MTV.

A film that does not fade away despite its age should not be overlooked. Especially so if someone takes the time and money to release it on newer media formats, such as a 1950s film on DVD.

Autumn Sonata is one good example. It is old (28 years), yet available at a public library. It was nominated for the Academy Award’s Best Actress in Leading Role and Best Original Screenplay and also won various awards worlwide. It is Swedish, but also released with English subtitles and an optional dubbed soundtrack. It was transferred to DVD format.


Labels:

Friday, February 03, 2006

I'm back

Yes I am still alive, but busy with the festivities.

A few relatives asked me if i wanted to watch the latest girlie comedy flick, Shopaholic. The other alternative would be to stay at home while my brother's friends came over to visit.

Having visited a few friends yesterday, I am well aware that things can get noisy, so I went for the moving picture. Also, I wanted to look at the prices at a few camera shops in 1 Utama.


I went into the cinema expecting nothing more than a suck-cock experience. Maybe not suck cock, but romantic comedy is not my kind of movie. I had zero expectations, and was fully prepared to bail out of the theatre to survey the camera market.

The film was not as bad as initially feared. There were comical moments, some touching scenes, a moderately coherent plot but a tad too much filler material. Yesterday, TChuen told me that SJian used to like Cecilia Cheung (the star actress) a lot. I can see why.


So this is for SJ, even though he does not come to this backwater little province of the internet. [image source]



I have no regrets about going for the movie. But then, it was fully paid for by my aunt.

There is a lesson to be learnt here- expect nothing, and when something turns up, you'll be happy. It's actually a parallel (or is it a mirror?) of the other well known lesson- don't get attached to something, because when you lose it, you'll be pissed off.



So the path to happiness is simple. Note I did not say 'easy to traverse'.


Labels: ,

Monday, October 31, 2005

David Berlinski's A Tour of the Calculus

I have in my care a brilliant book by a certain David Berlinski, “A Tour of the Calculus”. The San Francisco Chronicle enthusiastically described the author as follows:

“He is both a poet and genius. And he’s funny [...]. The writing is clean and powerful […]. Go Berlinski, go.”

The New York Times’ comment was slightly less cheerful and bubbly, but nonetheless full of praise.

“Playful, witty, highly literate […] a wonderful and enlightening book”



Here are a few of interesting quotes from the book:
But where before there was nothing more than an emptiness answering to the square root of 2, a new number now appears, a Dark Prince, an object utterly unlike any rational number, one flushed from the shadows and full of brooding mystery.

Although his talent was evident from an early age, Dedekind passed his professional life as an instructor at a technical high school in Brunswick, the place of his birth. Nineteenth-century German Hochschule were rather more demanding institutions than contemporary American high schools […]. Still, high schools are all the same, superficial variants of some central high school which is located in Hell.

Now sever the rational numbers into two classes A and B, such that every number in A, when squared, is less than 2 and every number in B, when squared, greater. On one side are the numbers in A, like firecrackers popping off when squared; no matter how they pop these numbers never pop past 2. On the other side are the numbers in B, like firecrackers popping off when squared; no matter how they pop these numbers always pop past 2.





Labels: