The elegance of mathematics
I’ve been trying to count the number of elementary operations f(k) needed to compute the determinant of a k x k matrix of real elements.
This is the general form for the number of elementary operations:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3631d/3631dc00cb2825cca9a2bdc79aa90885f6889d99" alt=""
Since this is a recursive function, we need to define the first case, which is the trivial case of a one-element matrix: f(1) = 0. The determinant is simply the value of the element, and no operations are necessary to arrive at this conclusion.
Now for the bragging bit. I managed to reduce the recursive function into a more manageable function that can be computed without knowledge of f(k-1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a4b/48a4b3de3573ed7da843b19dcc2c1f759e7ce323" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5148e/5148ec3792477985cebdce99b80d4fbc71093024" alt=""
The elegance behind mathematics is such that it is possible to convince people that there is a higher being.
Appendix
Re-expressing the function by removing k! from the summation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de336/de3360fc15729e0b5ea1ba624b089acd11713843" alt=""
Interestingly, the constant e can also be defined as such:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35c5e/35c5e43565017326870240de3ff90e475c9b2187" alt=""
But the series is a sum of infinitely many terms, as compared to f(k) which has only k terms. Thus a finite series such as that found in f(k) does not actually equal e, but converges towards e.
Comparing the definition of e with f(k):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2915/c2915e2461177e96979f5a95594550a229679311" alt=""
The growth rate of the factorial term is so fast that it very rapidly overwhelms the (k-1) term, and thus (k-1) can be dropped from the approximation. To illustrate the difference in scale using k=15:
k-1 = 15-1 = 14
k! = 15 x 14 x 13 x … x 2 x 1 = 1.3 x 10^12 (there are 13 digits in this number)
Mathematics
This is the general form for the number of elementary operations:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3631d/3631dc00cb2825cca9a2bdc79aa90885f6889d99" alt=""
Since this is a recursive function, we need to define the first case, which is the trivial case of a one-element matrix: f(1) = 0. The determinant is simply the value of the element, and no operations are necessary to arrive at this conclusion.
Now for the bragging bit. I managed to reduce the recursive function into a more manageable function that can be computed without knowledge of f(k-1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a4b/48a4b3de3573ed7da843b19dcc2c1f759e7ce323" alt=""
Further investigation and lucky breaks has revealed that f(k) converges to e*k! (e = 2.172818…) very rapidly. At k=18, it is accurate to within 15 significant figures. At k=19, the accuracy is at least 30 significant figures.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5148e/5148ec3792477985cebdce99b80d4fbc71093024" alt=""
Appendix
Re-expressing the function by removing k! from the summation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de336/de3360fc15729e0b5ea1ba624b089acd11713843" alt=""
Interestingly, the constant e can also be defined as such:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35c5e/35c5e43565017326870240de3ff90e475c9b2187" alt=""
But the series is a sum of infinitely many terms, as compared to f(k) which has only k terms. Thus a finite series such as that found in f(k) does not actually equal e, but converges towards e.
Comparing the definition of e with f(k):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2915/c2915e2461177e96979f5a95594550a229679311" alt=""
The growth rate of the factorial term is so fast that it very rapidly overwhelms the (k-1) term, and thus (k-1) can be dropped from the approximation. To illustrate the difference in scale using k=15:
k-1 = 15-1 = 14
k! = 15 x 14 x 13 x … x 2 x 1 = 1.3 x 10^12 (there are 13 digits in this number)
Mathematics
Labels: mathematics
<< Home