### How I disproved the existence of the week

I’m done with my exams this semester.

At the moment, I’m taking a few days off before restarting work on my major project. We’ve got plenty to catch up on for that one.

It appears that today is Friday, but it feels very much like a Sunday.

From the above sentence, we say that

On the other hand, most people tell me the days are ordered in this manner:

Combining

Note that we can freely interchange the Fridays and Sundays from

However, the order of days as given in

I would rather believe what I sense rather than plainly agreeing to what others tell me. So

And thus, it should be clear that the days of the week as presented in

On another note, I borrowed something from the mathematics library this afternoon:

From Pythagoras to Riemann

by Jeffrey Stopple

Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2003.

Should be an interesting read. I am partly familiar with both Pythygoras and Riemann. Everything in between should fall into place like a well oiled

At the moment, I’m taking a few days off before restarting work on my major project. We’ve got plenty to catch up on for that one.

It appears that today is Friday, but it feels very much like a Sunday.

From the above sentence, we say that

*Fridays and Sundays are one and the same*(**statement 1**).On the other hand, most people tell me the days are ordered in this manner:

*Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday…*(**statement 2**)Combining

**statement 1**and**2**:*Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Sunday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday…*(**statement 3**)Note that we can freely interchange the Fridays and Sundays from

**statement 2**due to the relationship given in**statement 1**.However, the order of days as given in

**statement 3**violate that given in**statement 2**. Hence,*the truth of*(**statements 1**and**2**are mutually exclusive**statement 4**): they cannot be true at the same time.I would rather believe what I sense rather than plainly agreeing to what others tell me. So

*(***statement 1**is true and**statement 2**is false.**statement 5**)*[We’re short on time here. I’ll just jump a few steps ahead and you can figure out the intermediate proofs at your own pace.]*And thus, it should be clear that the days of the week as presented in

**statement 2**do not exist.*Q.E.D.**On another note, I borrowed something from the mathematics library this afternoon:

**A Primer of Analytic Number Theory**

From Pythagoras to Riemann

by Jeffrey Stopple

Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2003.

Should be an interesting read. I am partly familiar with both Pythygoras and Riemann. Everything in between should fall into place like a well oiled

*yau zha kuai*into a bowl of*bak kut teh*. Actually, that's flawed reasoning, and a horrid analogy to boot.*Q.E.D.*- "*quod erat demonstrandum*", Latin for "that which was to be demonstrated"
## 1 Comments:

Stupid observations, though interesting. Write something about lawyers and their interchangeble rear-ends and mouths.

Post a Comment

<< Home